sturtle [dot] com

As experience has shown, the absence of sexual complementarity in [homosexual] unions creates obstacles in the normal development of children who would be placed in the care of such persons. They would be deprived of the experience of either fatherhood or motherhood. Allowing children to be adopted by persons living in such unions would actually mean doing violence to these children, in the sense that their condition of dependency would be used to place them in an environment that is not conducive to their full human development.

— papal bull (I use the term loosely) from the New York Times

So, leaving children in the care of two loving, caring, homosexuals is worse than leaving them in the care of one unsupervised, lecherous, homosexual priest?

And what “experience” has shown him this? Does anyone know of a study that proves his wacko conclusions? Frankly, I was under the impression that just the opposite was true…