[via CTRL+W33D, obvs]

Obviously, I’m a liberal. Sure, I understand the Republican and Libertarian impulse to let people stand on their own, to allow everyone to be the captain of his or her own ship: it’s a nice sentiment, one that acknowledges free will and encourages independence.

Only problem is, most of the Republicans and Libertarians I know are white folks who were born with a leg up. They may not be terrifically well educated, and they may not live in the fanciest neighborhoods, but they’re very happy with what they have, and they’ll go to great lengths to protect it.

Many of the Democrats I know are also white folks who are happy with what they have. The difference is, they’re typically willing to share. No, things don’t always play out that way in practice — the political machines of both major parties have their own, convoluted agendas. However, underlying the Democratic ethos is the notion of helping others. And that, to me, is everything.

I’m not saying that people should be able to sit back and relax and let the government pay for bonbons and hookah parlors. But not everyone is cut out to care for him or herself. Some need a gentle push, some need help coordinating a game plan, and some need daily assistance. The Calvinist work ethic is fine — it’s been drilled into me all my life — but I know for a fact that some people can’t handle that much responsibility.

On the other hand…I don’t like the fact that my voting patterns are predetermined by political affiliation. It would be nice to be able to vote for a Republican, if the situation arose. Unfortunately, the GOP social agenda makes that impossible — and I’m not just talking about their opposition to equal rights for LGBT citizens, even though that’s the part that affects me most directly. Until the party moves beyond that Religious Right crap — which has only been adopted into the platform to appeal to the god-fearing base — they can count me out.

Given the current crop of leaders, progress doesn’t seem possible. But there may be hope down the line. Here’s a bit from John McCain’s daughter, Meghan, speaking about former Miss California and current anti-gay activist, Carrie Prejean. Prejean’s eight recently unearthed sex tapes are causing quite a stir in the media, but not among Republicans who want to make her their pretty posterchild:

The problem I have with my fellow Republicans is why gay marriage is the trump card in any situation. It seems that as long as you are against gay marriage, any scandal in your life can be overlooked or overcome. When you are in favor of it, however—and I have been very vocal about my support—that position defines you. [Towleroad]

I couldn’t have said it better myself. Why can’t the Republicans read the tea leaves and tout McCain as the face of the GOP’s future instead of the far-less-interesting, far-less-thoughtful, backwards-looking Prejean? Oh, wait: I think I just answered my own question.

I kinda like the “Sponsors of Tomorrow” campaign that Venables Bell & Partners put together for Intel. For reasons yet to be explained, Geek Chic remains a popular trend, and VBP has capitalized on it — humorously, cleverly, and in a visually distinctive way.

That said, the script for the spot embedded below drives me nuts. It features two nerds talking about the best way to cut a cake-cum-microchip (or maybe it’s supposed to be a motherboard, which wouldn’t make sense, but whatever). Eventually, a fed-up, presumably hungry fellow employee zips around the pair, lops off a corner of the cake, and walks off with a “Was that so hard?” expression.

By my thinking, the nerds’ response to this act of heresy should be hilariously geekified — like, “Fine. You explain to management how it’s supposed to work without a logic gate”, or, “I hope you enjoy the taste of that gallium arsenide core”, or anything that continues the nerds’ earlier conversation, wherein they discuss the cake as if it’s an actual microchip. (I’m not always a great copywriter myself, but I’m okay at spotting problems.)

Instead, the folks at VBP decided that one of the nerds should just look after the douchebag in question and shout, “Why don’t you just pop all the balloons and spit in the punch?” Which is fine in terms of cadence and consonance, but entirely misses the boat on continuity.

Of course, underlying all this is a far more important question: AM I THE ONLY IDIOT WHO OBSESSES ABOUT THESE THINGS? Take a look for yourselves and see if it’s as bad as I’m making out:

BEYONCE has come under fire for her lack of knowledge about ancient Egypt – by the country’s INDIANA JONES.

Revered historian Zahi Hawass, Egypt’s chief Egyptologist, reportedly called the pop star a “stupid person” while speaking to journalists during Beyonce’s recent tour of the Giza pyramids near Cairo.

Reporter Summer al-Gamal says Hawass, who claims he inspired Harrison Ford’s Raiders of The Lost Ark character, was annoyed by the pop star’s apparent lack of interest as she toured the ancient site.

According to Gamal, Hawass said, “I showed her the Sphinx and I gave her a book on King Tutankhamen,” during his self-guided tour.

The reporter says, “Then he stopped being diplomatic and said in anger, ‘She’s a stupid person and she doesn’t understand a thing and she doesn’t want to understand… She’s coming here to take pictures and that’s it.’”

[full story here]

[via BananaGuide]

[via CTRL+W33D, obvs]

A giant “digital cloud” that would “float” above London’s skyline has been outlined by an international team of architects, artists and engineers.

The construction would include 120m- (400ft-) tall mesh towers and a series of interconnected plastic bubbles that can be used to display images and data.

The Cloud, as it is known, would also be used an observation deck and park.

The unconventional structure was originally envisaged as a centre piece of the city’s Olympic village.

Its designers plan to raise the funds to build it by asking for micro-donations from millions of people.

“It’s really about people coming together to raise the Cloud,” Carlo Ratti, one of the architects behind the design from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) told BBC News.

–full story at BBC [via Towleroad]

Hmmm. If Tim Gunn were perusing that plan, he’d say “It’s a lotta look”. Sadly, I’m not Tim Gunn, so I’ll just suggest that it might be time to edit.

[via copyranter]